Skip to main content

The Purpose of my Blog

The purpose of my blog is to present what I consider to be practical ways to make the world a better place – a place in which the various systems: educational, political, economic, environmental, scientific, family, cultural, architectural, city planning, transportation, etc., are in harmony with Natural or Divine Law. Natural Law is here defined as those laws determined by our Creator, that when followed in universally consistent ways, facilitate the physical, material, spiritual and moral evolution of humanity – to help create a ‘New Renaissance’ in our world.

To see my basic philosophical/religious beliefs that underlie my presentations, click on the link on the right side of this blog, “
Statement of My Core Philosophical Beliefs”.

Comments

Jay said…
Hi!

I love that you are making a blog. Based on my experiences in your lectures, I think you are someone who thinks carefully before making assumptions--a quality that is absolutely essential to ensure rational thought processes.

That said, there is something I wish to ask before I proceed to read your next entry:

Why have you chosen to define "Natural Law" as "laws determined by our Creator"?
Tim Farage said…
I've always thought of Natural Law as those laws created by God, since God created nature. So I use the terms, "Natural Laws", "Divine Laws" and "God's Laws" interchangeably.
Jay said…
Ah! That is very logical.

I'm having some strange thoughts. Try to bear with me.

In life, we should seek to understand Natural Law before we act. If we act without knowing the principles of Divine Law, we run the risk of violating it, which could lead to disastrous consequence. This leads me to another question. I hope you don't mind.

How can we know Divine Law? As it is often said, God moves in mysterious ways. What steps should we take to define Natural Law in human terms?
Tim Farage said…
Defining 'Divine Law' is not easy to do, and every person probably has a different definition of it.

The definition that I give in 'Statement of my Core Philosophical Beliefs' has taken a long time for me to synthesize.

But I think God's will for us could be summarized pretty simply:

1) Love God and love others.
2) Treat others as you would like to be treated.
3) Use your talents to help make the world a better place.
4) Act as if whatever you do, for good or for ill, comes back to you.
Jay said…
Excellent. I think these principles probably summarize an approach to life that will lead to happiness and satisfaction.

However, I am not convinced that they are the best way. To limit oneself to one way of approaching philosophy is to risk not finding Truth.

Consider the example of the hot stove. Everybody agrees that one should not touch hot stoves. However, hot stoves are still occasionally touched. Think of me as a very young child. Merely telling me that touching the hot stove does not necessarily mean I will not do it. However, if you explain to me that stove touching will never get me anything I want and list all of the reasons why it doesn't, my natural curiosity will be less likely to lead me down a path toward certain pain.

I think religion is a more complex problem than stove touching. All people have learned that stove touching is a bad approach, but people disagree about larger and harder problems, such as this: "is there a God?" We cannot continue to ask other questions such as "what is the best philosophy?" until we have enough data to proceed.

I cannot ask you to prove to me that there is a God. Neither do I assume that there is not one. But I am terrified that if I proceed without knowing that I risk proceeding unwisely.

Help me to understand. What led you to the path of God?
Tim Farage said…
Well, I don't remember a time when I didn't believe in God, so I suppose you could say my parents led me to God.

Here's Einstein's view of religion and God:

"My religion consists of a humble admiration of the illimitable superior spirit who reveals himself in the slight details we are able to perceive with our frail and feeble minds. That deeply emotional conviction of the presence of a superior reasoning power, which is revealed in the incomprehensible universe, forms my idea of God."

Elsewhere Einstein wrote, "It is enough for me to reflect upon the marvelous structure of the universe and try humbly to comprehend an infinitesimal part of the intelligence manifested in Nature."

One suggestion I have is to read the Gospel of Matthew. I think that if you do that, you will say to yourself, "Christ must be 'the guy'. I think I'd better listen to what he has to say.
Jay said…
I read the passage. But I still don't see Christ as "the guy".

However, I was changed; I now feel that religion is a legitimate comment on the magnificent mystery that we call "Reality." Though not a complete one.

I don't think either of us want to argue about what belief system is the closest to explaining everything, but I will say this: Christianity and Bible-reading are not a perfect method for seeking truth.

Now, for something completely different:

Pursuant to your stated goal of helping to stimulate a "New Renaissance": http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=87yq372R4Ts

Popular posts from this blog

Is it possible to program benevolence into an AI?

Benevolence is really an emotion, just as are anger, enjoyment, and other emotions. 
We have no idea as to how to program a computer (or AI which is a computer program possibly controlling some hardware) to have feelings. We have no idea as to how to program a computer to be self-aware or to care about anything.
There is a debate about this. Some computer scientists think that we’ll eventually be able to program AI’s to have feelings and be self-aware and some computer scientists don’t think so.
And if they do become self-aware, would that be bad? More than a few scientists think so.
Stephen Hawking, for example, has stated: “I think the development of full artificial intelligence could spell the end of the human race.”
Bill Gates, the founder of Microsoft, is equally concerned: "I am in the camp that is concerned about super intelligence. First, the machines will do a lot of jobs for us and not be super intelligent. That should be positive if we manage it well. A few deca…

Save us from Leftists

By definition, Leftists want the government to control much of their money and lives. Governments are run by politicians, which have a favorability rating around 15–20%. Who wants them to control the economy or our lives?

If you do, look around at the numerous countries that have tried this. They invariably get corrupt and their people become poor.

I’m not against programs that give money to parents to educate their children as they see fit. I’m also not against programs that give money to each of us to provide for medical expenses. But this money should go to all equally so that we have ‘equal rights before the law’.

If structured properly, these programs don’t allow Congress to control our lives because parents would be able to choose the school for their children.

And adults could choose their doctors and hospitals for them and their children.

Leftists such as United States Senator Elizabeth Warren, “Unveiled a proposal (in February 2019) outlining the Universal Child Care and Earl…

Will mankind survive overpopulation, resource shortage and climate change?

I’m going to reduce the anxiety in your life. Here’s how: Overpopulation is not a problemWe’re not running out of resources“Climate Change” may be disruptive, and it may even be better for humanity Let’s take these one at a time. Overpopulation In 2017 world population is about 7.5 billion. Here is a UN graph of the projected population until 2100:

So it seems Earth’s population will top out this century between 9 to 10 billion people. Modern countries can easily feed, provide clothing and housing, etc., to its citizens. Developing countries have a problem because their governments are corrupt and don’t allow its citizens freedom, especially free markets. As countries modernize they get richer. Notice the growth of China, for instance, because its government has been allowing free enterprise. Natural Resources Reports of running out of natural resources have appeared for decades and maybe a century ago. Instead we’re finding more and more natural resources. Fracking has allowe…